Evaluation of Chemical Residues Originated from Automatic Hematological Analyzers in the Municipality of Guarulhos, State of SÃ£o Paulo, Brazil
Keywords:Health Services Residues, Dangerous Residues, Formic Acid, Environmental Health.
Introduction: If incorrectly managed, dangerous chemical residues produced by clinical analysis laboratories are worrisome. These residues can represent serious environmental and human health hazards if disposed improperly in the sewage system. Currently, the laboratories take over strategies with the potential to minimize the negative environmental impacts and public health risks. To demonstrate the current scenario and contribute to the sustainable development of these laboratories, it is necessary to evaluate the toxicity of hematological equipmentÂ´s chemical residue effluents.
Methods: A questionnaire was addressed to employees of 15 clinical analysis laboratories of the Municipality of Guarulhos, SÃ£o Paulo / Brazil. All these laboratories dispose the hematological equipmentâ€™s residues into the sewage system. The objective of the questionnaire was to appraise the daily average hematological exams performed in 2012. Through the data collected with equipment suppliers and analysis of the concentration of dangerous chemical residues diluted in the municipal sewage network, it was possible to calculate the volume of dangerous chemical residues generated by this equipment.
Results: The data showed a daily average of 2,800 examinations per laboratory, generating a daily disposal of 131,600 mL of chemical residues. Only formic acid was identified as dangerous chemical residue. About 1,680 mg per day of this residue is disposed. Diluted in the average daily sewage volume of 32,500 m3, it represents a concentration of 0.052 mg/m3 or 5.2 x 10-5 mg / L.
Conclusion: Despite the large volume of chemical residues generated by hematological analyzers and disposed into the sewage system of Guarulhos, the data indicates low toxicity concentration in the sewage system. Therefore, there is no evidence of enough toxic residues to be responsible for creating environmental risks.
Reynaldo EMFL, Janissek PR, Vasconcelos EC. ResÃduos quÃmicos produzidos em equipamentos de anÃ¡lises hematolÃ³gicas: conhecimento e prÃ¡ticas nos laboratÃ³rios. J Bras Patol Med Laborat. 2012;48(1):15â€“20.
[â€œChemical residues produced in hematological analysis equipment: knowledge and laboratory practiceâ€]
Brazil. Environmental Secretary (Ministry). National Environmental Council. CONAMA Resolution No. 358, of April 29, 2005. Treatment and final disposal of health care service residues and other provisions; Federal Gazette; Executive Branch, Brasilia, DF May 4th,2005. Section 1:63-5
BRAZILIAN ASSOCIATION FOR TECHNICAL STANDARDS (ABNT) NBR 10004: Solid Residues - Classification. Rio de Janeiro: ABNT 2004
BRAZIL. Law No. 12305 of August 2nd,2010. Establishes the National Solid Waste Policy: Amends Law No. 9.605, of February 12th,1988, and other measures. Federal Gazette, Brasilia, 2010.
Chaves LC, Campos LM, Filipini R, Abreu LC, Valenti VE, Azzalis LA, et al. Potentially hazardous waste produced at home. Int Arch Med. 2013;6:27.
GÃ¼nther WMR Development of a Waste Management Plan for Health Services â€“ PGRSS. FSP-USP Workbook; SÃ£o Paulo, 2010.
Brazil. Health Ministry. National Health Surveillance Agency. RDC No. 306, of December 7th, 2004. Technical Procedure for the Health Services Waste Management. Federal Gazette, Brasilia, December 10th,2004. Section 1: 49-55
Jardim WF. Chemical Residues Management in Teaching and Research Laboratories. Quimica Nova Magazine, 1998; 21 (5):671-673.
Brazil. Ministry of Health. Health Care Secretary. Specialized Care Dept. Hematology and Hemotherapy: Management Guide for Residues. Ministry of Health, Health Care Secretary, Specialized Care Dept.- Brasilia: Ministry of Health, 2011 : 236.
CETESB SÃ£o Paulo State Environmental Agency. Technical Standard: Norma TÃ©cnica P4.262. Management of Chemical Waste Generated by Health Care Establishments: Procedure: August / 2007.
Eigenheer E. Hospital Waste: Legal Fiction or Sanitary Reality? Rio de Janeiro. Semads, 2002
Brazil. Environment Ministry. Resolution of the National Counsel for the Environment CONAMA No: 430, of May 13th, 2011. Conditions and Disposal Standards for Effluents, completes and amends Resolution No. 357, of March 17th, 2005, of the National Counsel for the Environment CONAMA. Federal Gazette: Executive Branch, Brasilia DF, May 16th, 2011. Section 1: 89
LeÃ£o JP, Ramos AT, Maruo VM, Souza DPM, Neiva JNM, Restle j, et al. Simple Anatomopathology for Cattle fed with Glycerol. CiÃªn Rur. 2012; 42(7):1253-1256.
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Available at:
<https://www.osha.gov/dts/chemicalsampling/data/CH_242800.html>. Access on July 20th, 2016.
FISPQ: Chemical Product Information Form. SÃ£o Paulo State Environmental Agency â€“ CETESB. Formic Acid, 2016. Available at: <http://sistemasinter.cetesb.sp.gov.br/produtos/ficha_completa1.asp?consulta=%C1CIDO%20F%D3RMICO>. Access on July 24th, 2016.
TRATA BRASIL. â€˜Trata Brazil Instituteâ€™ discloses the ranking of waste water treatment with the evaluation of the services of the 79 largest cities in Brazil. Available at: <http://www.tratabrasil.org.br/instituto-trata-brasil-divulga-ranking-do-saneamento-com-avaliacao-dos-servicos-nas-79-maiores-cidades-do-pais>. Access July 20th, 2016.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under aÂ Creative Commons Attribution LicenseÂ that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (SeeÂ The Effect of Open AccessÂ and Benefits of Publishing Open Access).