Evaluation of instruments for the use of a condom

Authors

  • Carla Suellen Pires de Sousa State University of Ceará (UECE)
  • Eveliny Silva Martins Federal University of Ceará (UFC)
  • Anaíze Viana Bezerra de Menezes State University of Ceará (UECE)
  • Maria Lúcia Duarte Pereira State University of Ceará (UECE)
  • Luana Ibiapina Cordeiro State University of Ceará (UECE)
  • Ana Karina Bezerra Pinheiro
  • Priscila de Souza Aquino Federal University of Ceará (UFC)
  • Régia Christina Moura Barbosa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3823/2103

Keywords:

Descriptors, Condom, Scales, Validation Studies.

Abstract

Introdution: The usage of scales directed to the health area is a relevant contribution to clinical practice, because the measures are more reliable and standardized. Objective: to analize the studies that used scales to evaluate the usage of the condom by different populations. Method: It is about integrative review the search was performed in three data bases. After choosing the articles, eight were read and its informations were grouped and inserted in the analysis. Results: the results pointed the appearance of three categories: Self-efficacy and usage of the condom, attitude and skill to the usage of the condom and barriers to the usage of the condom. Conclusion: This review observed wich process of adaptation and validation of already existent tools results in its bigger propagation in literature.

References

Ministério da Saúde (BR). Secretaria de Atenção à Saúde. Departamento de Atenção Básica. Saúde sexual e saúde reprodutiva. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2013. http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/saude_sexual_saude_reprodutiva.pdf

LaCroix JM, Pellowski JA, Lennon CA, Johnson BT.Behaviouralinterventios to reduce sexual risk for HIV in heterosexual couples: a meta- analysis. Sex TransmInfect. 2013; 89 (8):620-7. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23918756.

Reis RK, Melo ES, Gir E. Factors associated with inconsistent condom use among people living with HIV/AIDS. RevBrasEnferm. jan-fev 2016; 69(1): 47-53. http://www.scielo.br/pdf/reben/v69n1/0034-7167-reben-69-01-0047.pdf.

Bezerra EO, Chaves ACCP, Pereira MLD, Melo FRG. Análise da vulnerabilidade sexual de estudantes universitários ao HIV/AIDS. Rev Rene. 2012;13(5): 1121-31. http://www.revistarene.ufc.br/revista/index.php/revista/article/view/1167.

Almeida SA, Nogueira JA, Goldfarb MPL, Batista FL, Barrêto AJR, Moreira ASP et al. Concepção de jovens sobre o HIV/AIDS e o uso de preservativos nas relações sexuais. Rev Gaúcha Enferm. mar. 2014;35(1):39-46. http://www.scielo.br/pdf/rgenf/v35n1/pt_1983-1447-rgenf-35-01-00039.pdf.

Silva MRB, Santos ME, Silva LA, Filho VF, Maturana HCA, Silva RB. Why they do not use?: a study about the accession of Adolescents not contraceptive methods and their Implications. Rev Saúde em redes. 2015;1(4): 75-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.18310/2446-4813.2015v1n4p75-83.

Brasil. Ministério do Planejamento, Orçamento e Gestão. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística-IBGE. Diretoria de Pesquisas. Coordenação de População e Indicadores Sociais. Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde do Escolar 2012. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE; 2013. http://biblioteca.ibge.gov.br/visualizacao/livros/liv64436.pdf

WorldHeath Organization. Global Reports: UNAIDS report on the global AIDS epidemic 2014. Geneva, 2014.

http://www.unaids.org/sites/default/files/media_asset/GARPR_2014_guidelines_en_0.pdf.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Diagnoses of HIV infection in the United Sates and Dependent Areas, 2013.National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention,Departamento of Health and Human Services. USA: CDC, 2015. http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pdf/library/reports/surveillance/cdc-hiv-surveillance-report-vol-25.pdf

Dourado I, Carthy SM, Manasa R, Calazans G, Gruskin S. Revisiting the use of condoms in Brazil. Rev. Brasil. Epidemiologia. 2015;18(l):63-88. http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-790X2015000500063.

Parra DI, Bayer GLA. Validez y confiabilidad de las escalas de comunicación y coordinación para medir rol interdependientemenfermaria. Avances em Enfermeria. 2010; 28(1):51-62. http://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/avenferm/article/view/15627

Mendes, KDS, Silveira RCCP, Galvão CM. Revisão integrativa: método de pesquisa para a incorporação de evidências na saúde e na enfermagem. Texto Contexto Enferm Florianopólis. 2008;17(4):758-64.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S010407072008000400018.

Brafford LJ, Beck KH. Development and validation of a condom self-efficacy scale for college students.J Am Coll Health.1991; 39(5): 219-25. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1783705.

Asante KO, Doku PN. Cultural adaptation of the condom use self efficay scale (CUSES) in Ghana. Public Health.2010; 10: 2-7.http://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2458-10-227.

Shaweno D, TekletsadikE. Validation of the condom use self-efficacy scale in Ethiopia. Intern.Health & Human Rights.2013; 13:2-8.

http://bmcinthealthhumrights.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1472-698X-13-22.

Hanna KM. An adolescent and yong adult condom self-efficacy scale. Journal of Pediatric.Nursing. 1999; 14(1): 59-66. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10063250.

ThatoS, Hanna KM., Rodcumdee B. Translation and validation of the condom self-efficacy scale with thai adolescents and Young adults. Journal of nursing sholarship.2005; 37(1): 36-40. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15813585.

Cha SE, Kim KH, Buke LE. Psycometric validation os a condom self-efficay scale in Korean. Nurse rearch. 2008; 57(4): 245-51. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18641493.

Marinho LAB, Gurgel MSC, Cecatti JG, Osis MJDO. Conhecimento, atitude e prática do auto-exame das mamas em centros de saúde. Rev Saúde Pública. 2003; 37(5): 576-82. http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-89102003000500005.

Roy T, Anderson C, Evans C,Rahman MS, RahamanS. Cross-cultural adaptation of the short-form condom attitude scale: validity assessment in a sub-sample of rural-to-urban migrant workers in Bangladesh. Public.Health. 2013; 13: 2-10. http://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2458-13-240.

Talukdar A, Bal R, SanvalD, Roy K, Talukdar PS. Development of a scale for attitude toward condom use for migrant workers in India. Indian J. Med. Sci. 2008; 62(2):55-61. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18319532.

Mascarenhas AO. Gestão estratégica de pessoas. Evolução, teoria e crítica. São Paulo: CengageLeanirg. 2008.

Farris CA, Fenaughty AM., Lindemann DF. A condom skill scale: assessing condom skills among female drug users. J. Drug. Educ. 2003; 33(2):217-31. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12929711.

Nicolau AIO, Ribeiro SG, Lessa PRA, Monte AS, Bernardo EBR, Pinheiro AKB. Conhecimento, atitude e prática do uso de preservativos por presidiárias: prevenção das DST/HIV no cenário prisional. Rev Esc. Enferm. USP. 2012; 46(3): 711-19. http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0080-62342012000300025.

Jardim DP, Santos EF. Uso do preservativo masculino por adolescentes no início da vida sexual. Adolesc. Sáude. 2012; 9(2): 37-44. http://www.adolescenciaesaude.com/detalhe_artigo.asp?id=314.

Lawrence JS, Chapdelaine AP, Devieux JG, O´bannon RE, Eldiridge GD. Measuring perceived barriers to condom use: psychometric evolution of the Condom Barriers Scale. Rev. Assessment. 1999;6(4): 391-404. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10539985.

Doyle SR, Calsyn DA, Ball SA. Factor structure of the Condoms Barriers Scale with a sample of men at high risk for HIV.Rev.Assessment. 2009; 16(1): 3-15. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18689777.

Sunmola AM. Developing a scale for measuring the barriers to condom use in Nigeria.Bull World Health Organ. 2001; 79(10): 926-32. http://www.scielosp.org/scielo.php?pid=S0042-96862001001000005&script=sci_arttext

Downloads

Published

2016-09-20

Issue

Section

Nursing

Most read articles by the same author(s)