Pap Smear Abnormalities in Adolescents and Young Women

Authors

  • Gianna Roselli Venâncio Faculdade de Medicina do ABC.
  • Márcia Fuzaro Terra Cardial Faculdade de Medicina do ABC.
  • Salomon Katz Laboratório de Análises Clínicas Salomon Katz
  • Rodolfo Strufaldi
  • Luciano Melo Pompei Faculdade de Medicina do ABC.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3823/1856

Keywords:

Adolescent, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia, Cervical Cancer Prevention

Abstract

Introduction: Adolescence is a period in the life of a woman characterized by significant physical and psychological changes. In various places in the world it is also the period in which sexual activity usually begins. Sexual activity has been occurring increasingly earlier in adolescents.

Objective: To evaluate the prevalence of Pap smear abnormalities in adolescents and young women (MJA) compared to adult women (MA). Methods: Cross-sectional study of cervical uterine cytology obtained from women in Santo André (SP, Brazil) between January 2009 and December 2011, comparing the cytological results between MJA (age: 14-24 years) and MA (age: 25 years or over). Results: 92,118 exams evaluated; 76,752 in the MA group and 15,366 in the MJA group. Of the total, 89,723 were normal and 2,395 abnormal (1,278 [53.4%] corresponded to atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance [ASCUS], 900 [37.6%] to low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion [LSIL] and 217 [9.1%] to high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion [HSIL]). There were 510 (3.3%) abnormal tests in the MJA group and 1,885 (2.5%) in the MA group, of which 217 (42.5%) and 1061 (56.3%), respectively, were classified as ASCUS, 280 (54.9%) and 620 (32.9%), respectively, as LSIL, and 13 (2.5%) and 204 (10.8%), respectively, as HSIL. Conclusion: The most frequent abnormality in the MJA group was LSIL and in the MA group was ASCUS. HSIL was 4 times more frequent in adult women in comparison to young women and adolescents.

References

Referências

-Centro Brasileiro de Análise e Planejamento. Pesquisa Nacional de Demografia e Saúde da Criança e da Mulher – PNDS 2006. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde, 2009; 298 pp.

-Ministério da Saúde. Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde do Escolar. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde, 2012, 251pp.

-Instituto Nacional de Câncer. HPV e Câncer. Disponível em: http://mortalidade.inca.gov.br. Acesso em: 27/10/2014.

-Derchain SFM, Pinto Neto AM, Oliveira RLC, Santos CL, Pinto e Silva JLC. Infecção por papilomavírus humano e neoplasia intraepitelial cervical em adolescentes. J Bras Ginecol. 1991;101:499-503.

-Morrison EA, Ho GY, Vermud ST et al. Human papillomavirus infection and other risk factors for cervical neoplasia: a case control study. Int J Cancer. 1991;49:6-13.

-Kahn JA, Goodmann E, Huang B, Slap GB, Emano SJ. Predictors of Papanicolaou smear in a hospital-based adolescent and young adult clinic. Obstet. Gynecol. 2003;101(2):490-9.

-Instituto Nacional de Câncer. Estimativa de 2014 de incidência de câncer no Brasil. Disponível em: http://www.inca.gov.br/estimativa/2014/sintese-de-resultados-comentários.asp. Acesso em: 17/08/2014.

-Lüdicke F, Stalberg A, Vassilakos P, Major AL, Campana A. High- and intermediate-risk human papillomavirus infection in sexually active adolescent females. J Pediatric Adolesc Gynecol. 2001;14(4):171-4.

-Monteiro DLM. A cérvice uterina na adolescência: estudo da prevalência e fatores associados ao câncer de colo uterino e suas lesões precursoras em população de adolescentes no Rio de Janeiro. Dissertação de Mestrado. Rio de Janeiro: FIOCRUZ, 2004.

- Instituto Nacional de Câncer. Diretrizes brasileiras para o rastreamento do câncer do colo do útero. Rio de Janeiro: Instituto Nacional de Câncer e Ministério da Saúde, 2011, 104 pp.

-Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE). Disponível em: http://www.cidades.ibge.gov.br/xtras/home.php. Acesso em 28/10/2014.

-Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE). Disponível em: http://cod.ibge.gov.br/232PM. Acesso em 28/07/2014.

-International Agency of Research on Cancer - IARC. Working Group on Evaluation of Cervical Cancer Screening Programmes. Screening for squamous cervical cancer: duration of low risk after negative results of cervical cytology and its implication for screening policies. BMJ. 1986;293:659-64.

-Vale DB, Westin MC, Zeferino LC. High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion in women aged <30 years has a prevalence pattern resembling low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion. Cancer Cytopathol. 2013;121(10):576-81.

-Nascimento MI, Pires ES, GIL DQ et al. Características de um grupo de adolescentes com suspeita de neoplasia intraepitelial cervical. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2005;27(10):619-26.

-Mello ES. Rastreamento do câncer do colo uterino: desafios e recomendações. Onco& 2012; novembro/dezembro:30-35. Disponível em: http://www.revistaonco.com.br. Acesso: 20/12/2014.

-Insinga RP, Glass AG, Rush BB. Diagnoses and outcomes in cervical cancer screening: a populationbased study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 191(1):105-13.

-Solomon D, Nayar R. Sistema Bethesda para Citologia Cervicovaginal. Rio de Janeiro: Revinter, 2005, 192 pp.

-Nascimento MI, Pires ES, Gil DQ et al. Características de um grupo de adolescentes com suspeita de neoplasia intra-epitelial cervical. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2005;27(10):619-626.

-Kyrgiou M, Koliopoulos G, Martin-Hirsch P et al. Obstetric outcomes after conservative treatment for intraepithelial or early invasive cervical lesions: systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2006;367(9509):489-98.

-Ortoft G, Henriksen T, Hansen E, Petersen L. After conisation of the cervix, the perinatal mortality as a result of preterm delivery increases in subsequent pregnancy. BJOG 2010;117(3):258-67.

-Cirino FMSB, Nichiata LYI, Borges ALV. Conhecimento, atitude e práticas na prevenção do câncer de colo uterino e HPV em adolescentes. Esc Anna Nery Rev Enferm. 2010;14(1):126-34. Disponível em: http://www.revistaenfermagem.eean.edu.br. Acesso em: 20/12/2014.

Downloads

Published

2015-12-12

Issue

Section

Obstetrics & Gynecology