The Adverse Events in Lumbar Dynamic Stabilization: a Prospective Case Series
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3823/1798Keywords:
Lumbar vertebrae, Surgery, Spinal fusion, Low Back PainAbstract
BACKGROUND: We aimed to evaluate the complication rate in lumbar dynamic stabilization surgery for back pain in situations where conventional rigid implants could have been employed, with a follow-up of at least five years. METHODS AND FINDINGS: All patients who underwent semi-rigid lumbar spine fixation with the dynamic system consecutively between 2002 and 2007 in our departmentwere included. Minimum follow up period was 5. Adverse events and reoperations were registered for analysis. In the study period, 144 patients were treated with the dynamic system and studied. Three screws were badly positioned. There were two (1,39%) infections, with surgical cleaning necessary in one case. The late complications included a radiolucency signal in 22 screws (2,86%) and four broken screws (0,52%) out of 770 screws.Nineteen patients (20,13%) needed reoperation due to pain or screw associated problems. Three (2,08%) of these cases received additional treatment due to segmental kyphosis, five (3,47%) due to flat back, five (3,47%) due to adjacent level stenosis, 4 (2,7%) due to lumbar pain complaints, and two (1,39%) due to a broken screw. CONCLUSIONS: The lumbar dynamic stabilization system is an option for the treatment of degenerative spinal diseases. However it is not free of adverse events and had rates of implant failure, complications, and reoperations similar to those described on literature with rigid systems.Downloads
Published
2015-08-28
Issue
Section
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access and Benefits of Publishing Open Access).
Â
Â