A Comparative Study of the Cognitive Function of the Hearing-Impaired and Non-Hearing Impaired in Two Primary Schools in Lagos State, Nigeria
Keywords:Lagos, Nigeria, hearing-impaired, cognitive function, Standard non-verbal test, Deaf, Wesley School, Onitolo School, Cognition, Intelligence Test, Ravenâ€™s Intelligence Test.
Â Background: Thestudy was carried out in two primary schools in Lagos State, Nigeria using 302 respondents aged 6-20 years. The study compared the cognitive function of pupils from Wesley School for the hearing-impaired with pupils from Onitolo Primary School a main stream school to see if similarities or differences existed in their cognitive function and to determine the factors determining their performance on a standard non-verbal test.
Method: The instrument of data collection was the Ravenâ€™s Standard Progressive Matrices, a standard, non-verbal intelligence test.Â Statistical association using Chi-Square was used to test for associations between categorical variables. Kruskal-Wallis was used to test for association that was not normally distributed. The students were statistically matched and compared by bivariate analysis and multiple regression analysis for selected variables. Correlation Coefficient was used to examine linear relationships between selected independent variables and multiple linear regression analysis was used to examine which variables were significant predictors of performance taking possible confounders into consideration.
Results: Respondents from Wesley School were much older than respondents from the public main-stream school, class for class. There was no statistically significant difference in their cognitive functions.Â The mean score difference between the two schools was 0.54 with respondents from Wesley School scoring higher. Sex and class in primary school were determinants of score.Â Males scored higher than females.Â Respondents of skilled parents had the highest scores. There was no relationship between the time the child became hearing-impaired and their scores.Â The mean score difference between children that became hearing-impaired by their first year of life and children that became hearing-impaired after the first year of life was 1.83.Â The children that became hearing-impaired after their first year of life scored higher (P=0.46).
Conclusion: There was no statistically significant difference in the cognitive functions between the hearing-impaired and the non-hearing-impaired pupils.Â Children that are hearing-impaired should be given equal opportunities.
Keywords:Lagos, Nigeria; hearing-impaired; cognitive function; Standard non-verbal test; Deaf; Wesley School; Onitolo School; Cognition; Intelligence Test; Ravenâ€™s Intelligence Test.
Raven JC. Standard Progressive Matrices Sets A, B, C, D and E. 1958. Lewis & Co Ltd London.
Marschark M. Intellectual functioning of deaf adults and children: Answers and questions. Eur J Cogn Psychol, 2006;18 (1), 70-89.
Vernon M. Fifty years of research on the intelligence of deaf and hard-of-hearing children: A review of literature and discussion of implications. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ, 2005;10 (3), 225-231.
Lynn R, Irwing P. Sex differences on the progressive matrices: A meta-analysis. Intelligence, 2004;32 (5), 481-498.
Dubow EF, Boxer P, Huesmann, LR. Long-term effects of parentsâ€™ education on childrenâ€™s educational and occupational success: Mediation by family interactions, child aggression, and teenage aspirations. Merrill-Palmer Q (Wayne State Univ. Press),2009; 55(3), 224.
AraÃºjo LF, Giatti L, Chor D, Passos VMA, Barreto SM. Maternal education, anthropometric markers of malnutrition and cognitive function (ELSA-Brasil).BMC Public Health 2014;14:673. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-14-673.
Houston DM, Miyamoto RT: Effects of early auditory experience on word learning and speech perception in deaf children with cochlear implants: implications for sensitive periods of language development. Otology & neurotology: 2010, 31(8):1248.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under aÂ Creative Commons Attribution LicenseÂ that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (SeeÂ The Effect of Open AccessÂ and Benefits of Publishing Open Access).