Evaluation of instruments for the use of a condom

Authors

  • Carla Suellen Pires de Sousa State University of Ceará (UECE)
  • Eveliny Silva Martins Federal University of Ceará (UFC)
  • Anaíze Viana Bezerra de Menezes State University of Ceará (UECE)
  • Maria Lúcia Duarte Pereira State University of Ceará (UECE)
  • Luana Ibiapina Cordeiro State University of Ceará (UECE)
  • Ana Karina Bezerra Pinheiro
  • Priscila de Souza Aquino Federal University of Ceará (UFC)
  • Régia Christina Moura Barbosa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3823/2103

Keywords:

Descriptors, Condom, Scales, Validation Studies.

Abstract

Introdution: The usage of scales directed to the health area is a relevant contribution to clinical practice, because the measures are more reliable and standardized. Objective: to analize the studies that used scales to evaluate the usage of the condom by different populations. Method: It is about integrative review the search was performed in three data bases. After choosing the articles, eight were read and its informations were grouped and inserted in the analysis. Results: the results pointed the appearance of three categories: Self-efficacy and usage of the condom, attitude and skill to the usage of the condom and barriers to the usage of the condom. Conclusion: This review observed wich process of adaptation and validation of already existent tools results in its bigger propagation in literature.

References

Ministério da Saúde (BR). Secretaria de Atenção à Saúde. Departamento de Atenção Básica. Saúde sexual e saúde reprodutiva. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2013. http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/saude_sexual_saude_reprodutiva.pdf

LaCroix JM, Pellowski JA, Lennon CA, Johnson BT.Behaviouralinterventios to reduce sexual risk for HIV in heterosexual couples: a meta- analysis. Sex TransmInfect. 2013; 89 (8):620-7. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23918756.

Reis RK, Melo ES, Gir E. Factors associated with inconsistent condom use among people living with HIV/AIDS. RevBrasEnferm. jan-fev 2016; 69(1): 47-53. http://www.scielo.br/pdf/reben/v69n1/0034-7167-reben-69-01-0047.pdf.

Bezerra EO, Chaves ACCP, Pereira MLD, Melo FRG. Análise da vulnerabilidade sexual de estudantes universitários ao HIV/AIDS. Rev Rene. 2012;13(5): 1121-31. http://www.revistarene.ufc.br/revista/index.php/revista/article/view/1167.

Almeida SA, Nogueira JA, Goldfarb MPL, Batista FL, Barrêto AJR, Moreira ASP et al. Concepção de jovens sobre o HIV/AIDS e o uso de preservativos nas relações sexuais. Rev Gaúcha Enferm. mar. 2014;35(1):39-46. http://www.scielo.br/pdf/rgenf/v35n1/pt_1983-1447-rgenf-35-01-00039.pdf.

Silva MRB, Santos ME, Silva LA, Filho VF, Maturana HCA, Silva RB. Why they do not use?: a study about the accession of Adolescents not contraceptive methods and their Implications. Rev Saúde em redes. 2015;1(4): 75-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.18310/2446-4813.2015v1n4p75-83.

Brasil. Ministério do Planejamento, Orçamento e Gestão. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística-IBGE. Diretoria de Pesquisas. Coordenação de População e Indicadores Sociais. Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde do Escolar 2012. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE; 2013. http://biblioteca.ibge.gov.br/visualizacao/livros/liv64436.pdf

WorldHeath Organization. Global Reports: UNAIDS report on the global AIDS epidemic 2014. Geneva, 2014.

http://www.unaids.org/sites/default/files/media_asset/GARPR_2014_guidelines_en_0.pdf.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Diagnoses of HIV infection in the United Sates and Dependent Areas, 2013.National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention,Departamento of Health and Human Services. USA: CDC, 2015. http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pdf/library/reports/surveillance/cdc-hiv-surveillance-report-vol-25.pdf

Dourado I, Carthy SM, Manasa R, Calazans G, Gruskin S. Revisiting the use of condoms in Brazil. Rev. Brasil. Epidemiologia. 2015;18(l):63-88. http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1415-790X2015000500063.

Parra DI, Bayer GLA. Validez y confiabilidad de las escalas de comunicación y coordinación para medir rol interdependientemenfermaria. Avances em Enfermeria. 2010; 28(1):51-62. http://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/avenferm/article/view/15627

Mendes, KDS, Silveira RCCP, Galvão CM. Revisão integrativa: método de pesquisa para a incorporação de evidências na saúde e na enfermagem. Texto Contexto Enferm Florianopólis. 2008;17(4):758-64.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S010407072008000400018.

Brafford LJ, Beck KH. Development and validation of a condom self-efficacy scale for college students.J Am Coll Health.1991; 39(5): 219-25. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1783705.

Asante KO, Doku PN. Cultural adaptation of the condom use self efficay scale (CUSES) in Ghana. Public Health.2010; 10: 2-7.http://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2458-10-227.

Shaweno D, TekletsadikE. Validation of the condom use self-efficacy scale in Ethiopia. Intern.Health & Human Rights.2013; 13:2-8.

http://bmcinthealthhumrights.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1472-698X-13-22.

Hanna KM. An adolescent and yong adult condom self-efficacy scale. Journal of Pediatric.Nursing. 1999; 14(1): 59-66. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10063250.

ThatoS, Hanna KM., Rodcumdee B. Translation and validation of the condom self-efficacy scale with thai adolescents and Young adults. Journal of nursing sholarship.2005; 37(1): 36-40. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15813585.

Cha SE, Kim KH, Buke LE. Psycometric validation os a condom self-efficay scale in Korean. Nurse rearch. 2008; 57(4): 245-51. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18641493.

Marinho LAB, Gurgel MSC, Cecatti JG, Osis MJDO. Conhecimento, atitude e prática do auto-exame das mamas em centros de saúde. Rev Saúde Pública. 2003; 37(5): 576-82. http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-89102003000500005.

Roy T, Anderson C, Evans C,Rahman MS, RahamanS. Cross-cultural adaptation of the short-form condom attitude scale: validity assessment in a sub-sample of rural-to-urban migrant workers in Bangladesh. Public.Health. 2013; 13: 2-10. http://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2458-13-240.

Talukdar A, Bal R, SanvalD, Roy K, Talukdar PS. Development of a scale for attitude toward condom use for migrant workers in India. Indian J. Med. Sci. 2008; 62(2):55-61. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18319532.

Mascarenhas AO. Gestão estratégica de pessoas. Evolução, teoria e crítica. São Paulo: CengageLeanirg. 2008.

Farris CA, Fenaughty AM., Lindemann DF. A condom skill scale: assessing condom skills among female drug users. J. Drug. Educ. 2003; 33(2):217-31. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12929711.

Nicolau AIO, Ribeiro SG, Lessa PRA, Monte AS, Bernardo EBR, Pinheiro AKB. Conhecimento, atitude e prática do uso de preservativos por presidiárias: prevenção das DST/HIV no cenário prisional. Rev Esc. Enferm. USP. 2012; 46(3): 711-19. http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0080-62342012000300025.

Jardim DP, Santos EF. Uso do preservativo masculino por adolescentes no início da vida sexual. Adolesc. Sáude. 2012; 9(2): 37-44. http://www.adolescenciaesaude.com/detalhe_artigo.asp?id=314.

Lawrence JS, Chapdelaine AP, Devieux JG, O´bannon RE, Eldiridge GD. Measuring perceived barriers to condom use: psychometric evolution of the Condom Barriers Scale. Rev. Assessment. 1999;6(4): 391-404. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10539985.

Doyle SR, Calsyn DA, Ball SA. Factor structure of the Condoms Barriers Scale with a sample of men at high risk for HIV.Rev.Assessment. 2009; 16(1): 3-15. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18689777.

Sunmola AM. Developing a scale for measuring the barriers to condom use in Nigeria.Bull World Health Organ. 2001; 79(10): 926-32. http://www.scielosp.org/scielo.php?pid=S0042-96862001001000005&script=sci_arttext

Downloads

Published

2016-09-20

Issue

Vol. 9 (2016)

Section

Nursing

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access and Benefits of Publishing Open Access).

 

 

Most read articles by the same author(s)